::Observations-Gen Xodus - Gen X Has Left the Building... II I recall a class given by my Theology Professor, John Capper (even after I graduate, I call him my professor, I guess he still is in many ways). He described the difference between the philosophical frameworks in Europe (where he studied for a few years) and Australia. It was fascinating to watch my fellow students as he described the philosophical driving force behind their world view, namely "Pragmatism".

The last two Australian Federal elections were fought on the grounds of, and well within the sphere of Pragmatism. "We'll give you cheaper mortgage repayments and slash taxes!" And which Australian can possibly forget being reduced from an individual person to "an economy" for the duration of both elections?

I recall sitting with Lindsay Tanner, federal member for Melbourne while he was still in opposition. We were discussing Australia's aid budget as part of the Voices for Justice Conference. I remember being quietly inspired as Lindsay talked about his colleagues on both sides of the house of representatives, saying that even though challenging Australian citizens to be generous and to share our national wealth with poorer nations was definitely *not* a vote winner, sometimes you just had to show leadership and do what was right. "Who knows? the conversation went on, you just don't know what consequences moral imagination and leadership might be responsible for in the long term? He went on to say, however, that this kind of work was difficult, whilst Australia's political landscape was one defined by Pragmatism.

Australia's world view is largely Pragmatism. "How will this action/activity benefit me/us?" Or may I use the crude term which I am constantly challenged with in Secondary and Tertiary schools and colleges... "Is this going to be on the exam sir?"

What is the consequence? What is the result? In a poor philosophical environment like Australia's, Pragmatism is further reduced to the notion "What's in this for me?"

The world view of Boomers and consequently Gen Y is largely that of Pragmatism. It is the philosophical framework that under girds the dominant world view.

The philosophical framework of Gen X was largely Existentialism, a philosophical framework that begins with the human condition. It was not about outcomes. It was about the living, feeling, acting human totality.

Whereas Boomers/Gen Y seem focused on the who, what, where, when and how of existence, Gen X'ers seemed to penetrate such conversations asking the vexing question "why"? Not in a pragmatic sense, rather in a deeper search for truth. Both as it pertained to the individual and to the greater whole which, as a given, was considered to be entirely inter related.

For all sorts of reasons, Gen X'ers were shown the door, and/or left the building. I fear that what also left the room were the kinds of conversations that could profoundly shape and influence the church in ways that are currently lacking.

I wonder to what degree an idealistic and altruistic voice is missing? I wonder what the church could be if it were to seek to reconcile with this missing generation. I wonder how we are the poorer for it?

(I need to make the obvious point that I am speaking in broad general terms, and am making assumptions about individuals and groups,knowing full well that there are exceptions all over the place. Please keep this in mind before you comment!)

Labels: Church, Culture, Gen X, Gen Y, Missiology, Mission, Philosophy

  Posted by Stephen @ 9:23 AM   5 comments

::Observations-Gen Xodus - Gen X Has Left the Building... I was listening to a radio program the other night (as I do driving home at odd hours) and the subject was Gen Y and the political process. They three people (one was the interviewer and the other two representing various aspects of the political process) were discussing if and how Gen Y engages in Australian politics. At one point in the discussion, a question regarding Gen X (the previous generation) and the nature of their involvement in the political process was asked.

They commentators begain describing how Gen X largely abandoned the political process. When asked "where are they", one of the commentators suggested that Gen X had largely forsaken the corporate approach (to everything) en masse and had taken up residence in the NGO sphere, as well as being found in areas of innovation and creativity. The values that drive Gen X (continues the commentator) tend to be more altruistic rather than monetary as in the case of Boomers (the generation proceeding Gen X) and Gen Y.

The conversation continued along this vein for a few minutes. While it did, my mind wandered to two other incidents.

The first was when a colleague of mine, Brian Holden (seen in this picture wearing his Liverpool FC shirt, poor misguided lad) was involved in a ministry exposure trip. As part of his theological education, the students spent some time in two of Australia's biggest cities, visiting all sorts of churches: some of the mega variety, medium and smaller sized churches as well as various church related ministries. The most glaring observation for him was that Gen X was by and large absent. As he tail ends Gen X, he was looking for those involved in ministry who are Gen X, and his comment was in all of the churches he visited, there were none in significant positions of influence, if at all.

The second incident, or more accuratley, phenomenon, is that of the bulletin board. I speak at any number of bible colleges and theological institutions throughout the year, in all parts of the country. On the bulletin boards, there are often advertisements for ministry positions, seeking students or soon to be graduates. The number of advertisments for ministry vacancies looking for people in the age bracket that is essentially Gen X (roughly 28 to 40 year olds) is quite significant.

I started to think about the implications for the church that essentially is missing the better part of a generation. When I move around mission training agencies and organisations in the NGO sector, it seems as though these parts of the church were the "promised land" of the Gen Xodus.

I need to reflect further what the implications for this disproportionate representation mean for the future of mission and ministry in Australia, and possibly elsewhere.

Your thoughts?

Labels: Church, Gen X, Gen Y, Ministry, Mission

  Posted by Stephen @ 8:49 PM   2 comments